Magazine Rumors Rankings Teams Headlines Lifestyle Ice Girls Videos Subscribe
 
Bookmark and Share
April 4, 2017 | 12:45am ET
Trying to make sense of the NHL's Olympic decision

TORONTO, ON -- By now, you should be well aware of the NHL's decision to screw over the players and keep them from representing their countries in the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea.

And while I share the players' disappointment -- to an extent, since I certainly won't be playing in the games (knee injury being the main reason, of course) -- I understand where the League is coming from. I don't agree with it. I don't like it. But I get it.

The NHL truly wants nothing to do with a 17-day break in the middle of their regular-season. No other sport has to halt action mid-season to accommodate an international competition. And you can be sure the last thing the League or the Vegas Golden Knights want is a timeout smack in the middle of the Knights' inaugural season.

There's also the risk of injury argument that Ottawa Senators owner Eugene Melnyk fudged up using when he made a bonehead comment about not wanting Sens captain Erik Karlsson to go play for Sweden and potentially beat up on Canada. Despite Melnyk's silly public comments (keep that crap to yourself, dude), injuries are a factor for just about all of the teams.

There's the condensed schedule, which potentially takes money away from certain owners' pockets, the ones who own their arenas (less opportunity for concerts, other events, etc. -- you can only squeeze so much in that 17-day window, pending tour dates and all that jazz), and also has teams worried about injuries, again.

At the end of the day, the NHL's owners are worried about money. It's NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman's job to look after his owners' best interests, no matter unpopular he's become in the public eye. And while the IOC and IIHF met the NHL's demands when it came to insurance, transportation and accommodations, as the NHLPA pointed out in its statement released Monday evening, it wasn't enough -- frankly, I'm not sure the NHL originally expected them to meet their demands. It's why Bettman offered the NHLPA the option to extend the current Collective Bargaining Agreement by two years in exchange for allowing the players to participate in the 2018 Games. What's in it for the owners?

The League certainly doesn't care what NBC, their U.S. broadcast partner, thinks. NBC voiced its disappointment, like everyone else, on Monday, but the NHL isn't generating any additional funds from them for Olympic participation, so what do they care? The NHL knows its given NBC a sweetheart television deal, and they're not afraid to remind them.

From a fan's perspective, are you really going to watch games at 7am ET / 4am PT? The NHL doesn't seem to think so, as it claims to have held a fan poll in Canada and the U.S. to determine if fans wanted to see a break in the season. How many fans were polled is not clear, but according to Dan Rosen's piece on NHL.com, 73 percent of Americans said "they were not in favor," while 53 percent of Canadians who participated "were against the break."

Playing in the Winter Olympics is a privilege, for any athlete, and being told you can't represent your country is a bit of a dick move. But playing Devil's Advocate, which is basically what this article is trying to do, these particular athletes make millions of dollars each year to play a sport for an owner that wants to protect its investment. Decent consolation prize, but shitty politics, right?

Most North American players I've spoken to in the past have said they'd take winning the Stanley Cup over an Olympic gold medal any day of the week. That doesn't diminish the value of participating the in Winter Games whatsoever, it just illustrates where the priorities fall; and playing in the Winter Olympics doesn't eliminate the Stanley Cup Playoffs. The sentiment among European players, from my discussions with them, is about 50/50, while Russians aren't messing around when it comes to representing their nation. But they used to have a choice. Now, it appears they do not... or at least not without the potential of being penalized for it.

And on a similar subject, if Washington Capitals owner Ted Leonsis allows Alex Ovechkin to suit up for Russia, what's stopping Evgeny Kuznetsov and Dmitry Orlov from doing the same? Or Swedish center Nicklas Backstrom. Or Canadian goalie Braden Holtby? Or American defenseman John Carlson? The Caps could end up losing six-to-eight players to the Olympics. Is Leonsis okay with the prospect of losing eight straight games in a 17-day span?

If the NHL holds firm on its decision and allows teams to govern their teams themselves, things could get really ugly, behind-the-scenes. And that's not something the NHL should want to see happen. Monday's decision was already a kick in the shin as it relates to future CBA talks.

Oh, and by the way, even though the last sentence in the NHL's statement ("We now consider the matter officially closed"), until the IOC locks the door, it's still open. In 2014, NHL player participation wasn't finalized until July of that year. So, we'll see.

The NHL was wise in making its decision now, though, versus next week or the one after that. The NHL Playoffs get underway April 12, and based on how some of the first-round matchups are looking, this Olympic chatter is probably going to take a backseat until the summer -- it'll probably poke its head during the World Championships, but that'll fizzle once the Stanley Cup Final gets underway, followed by the NHL Awards, the Expansion Draft, the NHL Draft, and then free agency.

As popular as it is to hate on Bettman and the League, and they can make it seem easy sometimes, you've got to give them some credit; they know what they're doing -- they'll take the week-long assault knowing it's going be on the backburner once the post-season gets underway.

And frankly, the NHL will use these "distractions" are added ammunition, if they need to.

Again, as I stated off the bat, I don't agree with the NHL's decision. I'd like to see the best go up against the best in the Winter Olympics. But I don't own a team. I don't have the luxury of not giving a crap how shortsighted my choices may be. At the end of the day, the NHL is concerned about the NHL, and I get that.

What about growing the game in Asia? I've got news for you, the NHL doesn't care about that, either. They care about one part of Asia, and that's China. That's why, with the help of some very deep-pocketed corporate sponsors (which, at the end of the day, made the League's decision pretty simple), they're playing two exhibition games, between the Los Angeles Kings and Vancouver Canucks, in Beijing and Shanghai in September. And all signs point to them doing that again in 2019 and 2020 (barring another anticipated lockout). And they're re-entering the European landscape with two regular-season games, between the Colorado Avalanche and Ottawa Senators, in Stockholm, Sweden, in November. And all signs point to them continuing that trend in 2019 and on, especially if the dollars match up.

So, from the perspective of expanding the NHL brand and the sport of hockey overseas, the NHL can argue that it's got that covered.

And they'll also argue that they're growing the World Cup of Hockey, pegged for 2020 in (likely) Edmonton, if everything aligns itself and there's no lockout. But they better enhance the crap out of their marketing strategy for that tournament, as the event in Toronto was poorly promoted, the fan village was in the wrong part of town, and the lack of buzz in the city was felt up through the championship game. But they've got a few years to figure that out, especially if the tournament is indeed hosted at Rogers Arena in Edmonton, and they'll also use the fact the NHLPA shares in those revenues as another way to combat anti-Olympic participation.

The door, for now, is closed on Olympic participation, but it's not locked shut. Until the IOC deadbolts the door, we'll reserve hope. After all, everything is negotiable.

David Pagnotta is the Editor-in-Chief of The Fourth Period. Follow him on Twitter.

SPEAK UP


 

ARCHIVES 
Feb. 24, 2017 Trade deadline could prove to active

Feb. 15, 2017 More to come in Montreal?

Feb. 10, 2017 Teams want to add, but who will help them out?

Feb. 05, 2017 It's time for teams to be realistic

Jan. 17, 2017 Isles owners evaluating overhaul

Jan. 10, 2017 Red Wings entering new territory

Jan. 02, 2017 Fountain of Youth working in Toronto

Contact Us | Jobs @ TFP | Our Team | Advertise | Privacy Policy
© 2017 TFP Media, Inc. | All Rights Reserved | The Fourth Period™ and Ice Girls™ are registered trademarks.