May 17, 2009
Canucks were good, but not great

CHICAGO, IL -- Before we officially dispatch the Ducks, Canucks, Capitals and Bruins, I'd like to take a moment to contemplate greatness. I have one example which I use consistently to illustrate this point.

Over the years, Chicago Cubs' fans have asked me why former Orioles' third baseman Brooks Robinson is in the Hall of Fame, and former Cubs' third baseman Ron Santo is not. When you look at their career statistics, Santo has better offensive numbers by a long shot: more home runs, a higher batting average and slugging percentage, and very close in runs batted in, in eight fewer seasons! Both players went to scores of all star games (Robinson 15 in 23 years, Santo 9 in 15 years). Robinson won the AL MVP Award in 1964, Santo was in the top 10 in NL MVP voting four times. And while Robinson had a decided advantage in the field, the fact that both won several gold glove awards (Robinson 16, Santo 5) suggests that both were consistently excellent fielders.

The big difference between the two exists in the post-season. Robinson went to the playoffs six times as an Oriole. He hit 35 points above his career average, including five series in which he hit better than .300. And of course, he virtually secured his position in the Hall of Fame with his fielding in the 1966, 1969 and 1970 trips to the World Series. Santo, despite playing a key role on some very good Cubs' teams, never reached the postseason at all.

This baseball example is relevant here because it clearly illustrates what we believe separates the very good from the great In sports, we measure the distance between those two attributes by how well a player performs against his toughest competition and in the most pressure-packed situations.

This is an especially relevant equation for the Vancouver Canucks and their stable of star players, led most prominently by goalie Roberto Luongo and backed by forwards Mats Sundin, and brother Daniel and Henrik Sedin.

Sundin is without question an excellent player. He was the top pick in the draft, and has since played 18 seasons in which he never played less than 70 games in any full season (he played 47 in the strike-shortened season of 1995, and 41 this year when he signed with the Canucks in mid-season). But despite being the centerpiece of some excellent Toronto teams, Sundin never made the Stanley Cup Finals and only went as far as the Conference Finals once, when his team was steamrolled in five games by a not-particularly potent Sabres' squad.

The Sedins were also drafted high in the first round. For eight seasons they have made a major impact on Vancouver's regular season, only to largely disappear each of the six times the Canucks made the postseason. Neither averaged so much as a point every other game in any of the Canucks post-season runs until this year, and other than Daniel's two-goal game in game six against Chicago, the Sedins accumulated their point total quietly.

And then there's Luongo, once the No.4 pick in his draft, and now the active NHL save percentage leader and a goalie consistently in the top 5 or top 10 in every major goaltending category. He is the only goalie in the league who also serves as his team's captain, and late in this most recent playoff his coach, Alain Vigneault, called Luongo his team's best player. But in this playoffs, Luongo gave up two soft goals late in game 4 to let Chicago back into a series, and then for the first time in his career was hit for a 7-spot in the decisive game six.

Compare that to how Chicago's two highly-drafted kids played. Jonathan Toews, their 21-year-old captain, emerged from a silent series to score two goals. And 20-year-old Patrick Kane, who not only scored three goals in the deciding game (six in the series), but scored three goals of unique individual beauty and creativity that are the reserve of the truly elite of the NHL.

We should not summarily dismiss very good-ness. There is a not-insignificant place for it in hockey. Players who are very good can still win and deserve both our attention and our respect.

Greatness is elusive -- it cannot really be taught or explained without visual support, but it always shows up at the most significant moments. Until they win, or until they perform better at the most important moments, the Vancouver Canucks and their stars should not be considered great players, and that's why they are going home with a month to go in the postseason.

Josh Mora, a Columnist with TheFourthPeriod.com, is an Anchor and Blackhawks Reporter with Comcast Sportsnet Chicago.
 
  Archives:
  Apr. 30, 2009 Flames didn't have enough force
  Apr. 21, 2009 More Penalties on the Way?
  Apr. 16, 2009 Bring on the Post-Season
  Mar. 26, 2009 Stop worrying, Hawks fans
  Mar. 09, 2009 Deadline Day isn't for everybody
  Feb. 24, 2009 Time to move the Bulin Wall is now
  Feb. 09, 2009 Blackhawks lobbying for All-Star Game
  Jan. 17, 2009 The Hockey Song
  Dec. 31, 2008 Winter Classic putting Chicago back on the hockey map
  Dec. 15, 2008 Blackhawks are "Growing Up"
  Nov. 19, 2008 Hawks' young studs coming into their own
  Nov. 04, 2008 Eight things I like about you
  Oct. 17, 2008 Savard will always be a Hawk
  Oct. 08, 2008 Blackhawks ready for exciting season
Sept. 30, 2008 Hawks still a few pieces away from contention
Sept. 15, 2008 Time for young Hawks to "commit"


 

Contact Us | Jobs @ TFP | Advertise | Privacy Policy
 
© 2009 TFP Media, Inc. | All Rights Reserved | The Fourth Period™ and Ice Girls™ are registered trademarks.